Prep and try our C_S4TM_2601 valid and latest training questions & answers

SAP C_S4TM_2601 Exam Overview:

SAP C_S4TM_2601 Exam Syllabus Topics:

SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Transportation Management (C_S4TM_2601) Sample Questions:

1. A regional calibration services distributor is adding depot-to-certification-center movements in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management while customer outbound delivery remains stable. Certification-transfer requirements from two depots should create freight units for the same certification center. During testing, one depot creates transportation demand correctly, but the second depot's transfers are assigned to a retired service-routing structure.
The active transportation network contains the certification center and intended carrier lanes. The rollout team finds that the second depot retained a legacy transportation relationship from a phased migration. The constraint is to correct only the intended certification-transfer flow without changing stable outbound delivery behavior or activating unrelated depot movements.
Which action best resolves the assignment issue?
Response:

A) Rebuild outbound delivery lanes so every depot uses one harmonized transportation location relationship.
B) Activate transportation relevance for all depot movements so every service-related document can be evaluated by planning.
C) Correct the second depot's transportation location and relevance assignment so intended certification transfers bind to the active certification-center lanes.
D) Manually redirect affected freight units to the certification center until migration data review is complete.

2. CHALLENGE 2 - Rail Cutoff Sequencing During Freight Order Creation
A planner proposes using one freight order sequencing rule for all intermodal shipments because it simplifies training. The terminal team notes that repair modules with urgent service windows need a different cutoff sequence from scheduled depot replenishment.
Which governance-aligned decision is best?
Response:

A) Use a differentiated sequencing approach that keeps common process governance while protecting urgent cutoff requirements.
B) Remove urgent service windows from planning so terminal cutoff handling remains consistent.
C) Let each planner decide sequencing manually so urgent shipments can be corrected case by case.
D) Use the single sequencing rule because training simplicity is more important than terminal-specific timing.

3. CHALLENGE 4 - Warehouse Surcharges and Delivery-Level Cost Allocation
A tester finds that warehouse handling surcharges calculate for individual freight orders, but delivery-level reporting cannot explain how costs were distributed to originating bonded warehouse deliveries. The inconsistency appears mainly after manual freight order adjustments.
What should be validated next?
Response:

A) Whether settlement allocation follows the executed freight order structure and originating delivery relationship.
B) Whether warehouse loading should be completed before deliveries become transportation-relevant.
C) Whether carrier output communication can replace charge calculation for bonded warehouse surcharges.
D) Whether bonded warehouse shipments should be priced outside SAP until the next warehouse rollout.

4. A regional mobile laboratory supplier uses SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management to plan outbound shipments for temporary testing-site kits and routine depot replenishment. Automatic planning reduces freight order count, and subcontracting to the contracted carrier works correctly. However, temporary-site kits are consolidated with replenishment freight that has more flexible delivery timing, causing several kits to miss the required site-opening window.
The field deployment team wants site-opening windows protected, while logistics wants to keep consolidation savings for routine replenishment. The constraint is to keep automatic planning and carrier subcontracting active while ensuring temporary-site timing is respected before freight orders are released.
Which planning decision best supports the constraint?
Response:

A) Adjust planning criteria so site-opening windows restrict consolidation before freight orders are finalized.
B) Exclude all temporary-site kits from automatic planning so deployment users can manage timing manually.
C) Keep the current planning setup and ask the deployment team to request wider site-opening windows after planning.
D) Increase consolidation weighting so the planning run continues reducing freight order count across temporary-site and replenishment freight.

5. A regional pool equipment distributor is adding depot-to-refurbishment-center transportation in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management while customer outbound delivery transportation remains stable. Refurbishment requirements from two depots should create freight units for the same refurbishment center. During testing, one depot creates transportation demand correctly, but the second depot's requirements are assigned to an obsolete service-return structure.
The active transportation network contains the refurbishment center and intended carrier lanes. The rollout team finds that the second depot retained a legacy location relationship during migration. The constraint is to correct only the intended refurbishment flow without changing stable outbound delivery behavior or activating unrelated depot movements.
Which action best resolves the assignment issue?
Response:

A) Rebuild outbound delivery lanes so every depot uses one harmonized transportation location relationship.
B) Manually redirect affected freight units to the refurbishment center until migration data review is complete.
C) Correct the second depot's transportation location and relevance assignment so intended refurbishment requirements bind to the active refurbishment-center lanes.
D) Activate transportation relevance for all depot movements so every service-related document can be evaluated by planning.

Solutions: